Sunday, September 7, 2008

Blog Entry 3: Olympics = Politics? I Don’t Think So.

Have all of you forgotten that the Olympic Games is actually all about promoting sports excellence?

The Olympic Games was founded on the initiative of a French Nobleman, Baron Pierre de Coubertin, on the vision to bring sportsmen from all over the world to compete in a variety of sports events and to promote better connection between countries of the globe.

However, it seems to me that his dreams have yet to come true. Indeed, countless world records have been set and human limits have been pushed again and again to a new extreme end in the history of Modern Olympic Games. Over the past one century, Olympic Games has never been able to stay clear of politics ever since its creation.

As early as 1936, when it was held in Berlin, Hitler took his Olympics to show off the post-First World War Germany. Hitler made full use of the chance to demonstrate the power of the Aryan race to show they are the best and in the Olympic Stadium Nazis flags flew high. 1980 is the year when the largest boycott event occurred in the Olympics History, US together with 61 other countries boycotted the Moscow Olympic Game. However, its was in the coming Los Angeles 1984 Olympics, the Soviet Union and 16 other countries boycotted the event as a retaliation to the previous humiliation. Sadly, this politics-parasitic Olympics tradition did not stop even in the recently concluded Beijing Olympics.

Have all of you forgotten that the Beijing Olympic Games is actually all about promoting sports excellence?

China, being one of the last few Communist nations left in the world today, has always painted an image of mystery and dictatorship in the democratic western world. Therefore, from the western side, China had attracted the attention of the globe ever since its success in application of hosting the Game. Everyone wanted to see what he mythical Chinese would bring for us.

On the other hand for the Chinese, the Olympic Game had been the chance that they had been for to show the world their warm hospitality and the country’s overall ability. They had termed this the “100 year dream”, they wanted to achieve the ambitious goal of hosting the best ever Olympic Game and would waste no effort in bringing a good impression to the world.

However, it was a pail of icy water right down the head for the Chinese. Since the beginning of 2008 and during the Torch Relay that was named the “Journey of Harmony”, very ironically, the journey of the Olympics Torch was not “harmonious” at all due to the many protests for human right abuses in China. Human right activists protested against the Mainland Communist Party and the recent crackdown in Tibet, violent conflicts occurred during several attempts to cease the flame. Meanwhile, as the Chinese were shouting “One World One Dream”, the Tibetans showed their slogan “Beijing 2008 Race for Tibet! Help Make the Beijing 2008 Olympics a Catalyst for Change in Tibet! “. They too did not want to miss the opportunity to attract international attention and support for their independence campaign. The entire torch relay was termed as “public relations disaster” for the China by The Times.

All of these had put some strokes of grey on the joyous moment of the Chinese and for the world. I truly believe that Olympics should be free of political influence. The Olympic Game was founded on the purpose of promoting harmony and friendship in the world, but political difference will only make this friendly session lose all its shades and hues.

International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogges had said: "If we allow political propaganda, it's the end of the harmony of the Olympic village, and the end of the harmony of the games." Do you still remember the tragic event in the 1972 Munich Olympic Game, where eleven Israeli athletes were kidnapped and ultimately killed by Palestinian terrorists, in trying to release 234 Palestinians? Come to think of it, how different was the actions of those human right protestors and activists from that of the terrorists in principle, all of them tried to “kidnap” Olympic Game for the “random” of political benefits.

"Keep the politics out of the Olympics. I am not sympathetic to those who would try to embarrass China, try to spoil the Games or try to make political hay out of the Olympics," said former U.S. president George H.W. Bush. Olympic Game is the only true joyous gathering for the entire human race; it is where people strive to bring human achievement to a greater height.

It is a pity when Man, out of his own greed, wastes no effort in ruining every cheerful moment created for any good cause, to simply gain any benefit for him. Olympics is where sportsmen show their might and prove their ability, let’s all remember that Michael Phelpes had won 8 golds in the Beijing Olympics and Bolt has become the fastest man on Earth ever.

Friday, May 30, 2008

“Democracy creates stability in a society.”

Democracy is defined as a system of government where political sovereignty is retained by people. Stability in society refers to a period where the country is making affirmative progress with no disruption economically, socially nor politically.

I agree that democracy creates stability in a society to a large extent.

Firstly, democracy maintains peace in the society during a shift of political power. Flipping through the book of history, you can almost never fail to notice the shed of blood and loss of lives whenever there is a change of government. For example, in the ancient China, K’ublai Khan overthrew the last emperor of the Song Dynasty by war and started the Yuan Dynasty, sacrificing countless number of lives. However, looking at a democratic society, you will find circumstances much more rejoicing as governments are decided by votes. In America’s 2004 Presidential Candidacy, George W Bush from Republican Party became the US president after winning the election. The event was peaceful and outcome well respected by the people, therefore, it is obvious that democracy can indeed reduce conflicts caused by shift of political power in society.

Furthermore, democracy helps create a capable government. It is because democracy offers the people political choices and the government is directly answerable to the people, a party must maintain a good self-conduct and stay efficient in maintaining the country, otherwise people will lose faith in them and change their votes in the next election. This is well reflected in Taiwan, when the Progressive Democratic Party, after many reports of its corruption, was voted down by the Taiwanese in the 2008 Presidential Election. Therefore, democracy effectively supervises the government with the help of the public, shaping a transparent and capable government that has the ability, the will to implement policies which will make the country prosperous and secure, and the society stable in every area.

On the other hand, when democracy is widely accepted as the “rule of majority”, it is also known as the “tyranny of majority”. This is because in a democratic society, it is the majority’s say counts, the majority’s decision implemented and the majority’s power exercised by the majority, neglecting the minority. This is when the minority becomes provoked and triggered to a riot which brought chaos to society. Such as in Sri Lanka, the LTTE resorts to means of violence to retaliate against Sinhalese government after feeling the Tamils are discriminated.

However, in my opinion, this happens when the society is not “mature” enough, when people take racial issue more heavily than the overall development of the society. In democracy, a wise citizenry who recognizes the greater importance of social and economic progress is required to cast an intelligent vote, so that societal stability can be maintained. For example, in Singapore, PAP is always victorious in election is because the people understand that PAP is reliable in maintaining a good development in the country,

In conclusion, as democracy stresses the consensus of the governed, a decision is made through agreement and everyone’s opinion is respected to the maximum, or in another word, equality is upheld. Conflicts will be reduced, and stability in society will be created and maintained. In fact, most of the world’s most developed countries today are democratic, such as US, Singapore, Korea, and Britain. This high level of development would be wishful without the stability in society, economy and politics, and this, is indeed the contribution of democracy.

Therefore, I agree with the statement to a large extent.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Notice 2

Gaobo's link has been corrected. Therefore please use the link under Friends section.

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Notice

Gaobo's blog had been changed to http://www.3e07-gaobo07.blogspot.com/
He completed his blog on the required date, the original link on my blog is faulty so please use the above link to access his blog.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

What happened to our students today?

Straits Times news, 31st January 2008, reported that a 37 years-old teacher caught a student using mp3 player when she was conducting the lesson. The teacher promptly confiscated the student’s mp3 player, but later the student confronted the teacher to claim his item back. Upon being refused, the student used vulgarities and abusive words on the teacher, and rummaged her handbag in search for his mp3 player. A few days later the teacher made a police report and the student was brought to the court. He was ordered by the community court judge to write a letter of apology to the teacher sincerely. (Click here for the news article.)

Upon hearing this news, I was so shocked that I immerge myself into the thoughts of what happened to our students today that made them so very disrespectful to a teacher?

I came from China, and one thing very different I discovered about the students in Singapore as compared to those in China is their respect for teachers. I have been in Singapore for a few years, and had encountered many events of students being disrespectful to teachers. For example in MRT train, there was a female teacher sitting near me. The train was full then and when a group of students boarded, one of them, apparently her student, approached her and said: “Ms **, can you give the seat to me as I want to sit down?” I was so astonished. How could a student request his teacher to give up the seat for him to seat?! It is utter rudeness.

Meanwhile back in China, there could be students not doing their homework but there is no students who would shout at a teacher, and being disrespectful. As we are deeply influenced by the Confucius teachings, such that teacher is held at very high regards by all part of the society and to the students, almost at a supreme position in school. As reflected in a Chinese old saying: being teacher for a day is being father for life”, this shows how much we respect the teachers.

I feel that this general attitude of students is really wrong and it should be changed. I always feel that the education on respecting teachers is not successful as the teachers in Singapore do not get the amount of respect which they should. I found out that many students did not treat teachers as teachers but as employees or workers hired with their money. Indeed you can say that equality is important to be upheld but isn’t it a supposed-thing for younger to show respect to the elders, and especially when they are the ones giving you the invaluable knowledge and ironically, they are the ones usually taught you to be respectful.

At last, I think it is important that the schools and parents should focus more on transferring the correct values to the children and teach them to be humble and sensitive, so as to cultivate a better personality in the children.

Source:
http://www.straitstimes.com/Latest%2BNews/Courts%2Band%2BCrime/STIStory_202082.html?vgnmr=1